AM ForensicsAM Forensics vs S-RM
S-RM is a corporate intelligence and cyber-security consultancy providing due diligence, investigations, and incident response, with a strong presence in the private-equity and law-firm markets.
/ How each is bought
The clearest difference is usually not features. It is what you are actually buying, who performs it, and what you own at the end.
AM Forensics
- Engagement
- Per-subject or per-matter engagement
- Pricing
- Fixed price and turnaround quoted at scoping
- Who does the work
- Named investigator, start to finish
- Independence
- Independent — no data-licensing revenue, no referral fees
S-RM
- Engagement
- Report product or bespoke matter
- Pricing
- Tiered report products and project quotes
- Who does the work
- Analyst teams by region
- Independence
- Independent consultancy
/ Side by side
These rows describe how each firm operates — facts you can verify — rather than judgments about product quality. Where a flat yes or no would mislead, the cell says so.
| Capability | AM Forensics | S-RM |
|---|---|---|
| Named investigator does the workNo handoff to an offshore research pool. | ✓Yes | −NoNamed analysts, assigned per matter. |
| Every finding tied to a cited sourceReports footnote the record behind each assertion. | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
| Primary public and corporate recordsFilings, courts, registries — not database aggregation alone. | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
| Metadata and digital-artifact analysisDocument provenance, EXIF, file-history examination. | ✓Yes | ~PartlyAvailable through the cyber practice as a separate service line. |
| Fixed price quoted before work beginsScope and cost agreed in writing, not billed open-ended. | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
| Report structured for counsel and courtWritten anticipating challenge and privilege. | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
| Single-subject engagements acceptedNo annual contract or subscription minimum. | ✓Yes | ~Partly |
| AML and financial-crime contextFindings interpreted against BSA/AML expectations. | ✓Yes | ~Partly |
| Named turnaround commitmentA date, agreed at scoping. | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
/ Where S-RM is the better call
We would rather you buy the right thing than buy from us. Here is where S-RM genuinely wins.
S-RM does this well
- Strong private-equity transaction diligence practice with reliable turnaround
- Combined intelligence and cyber capability under one roof
- Good coverage across EMEA jurisdictions
Best for: Private-equity and corporate transaction diligence at pace across multiple targets.
Where teams still come to us
- Volume analyst delivery means depth varies with who is assigned.
- Tiered report products can under-serve a subject that does not fit the tier.
- AML-specific interpretation of findings sits outside the core offering.
AM Forensics fits when: Subjects that need judgment rather than a template — where the interesting facts are structural, and someone senior has to notice them.
/ Three reasons teams choose AM Forensics instead
No template to fall back on
Every subject is scoped individually. Where the record is thin, the report says what was searched and what was not found — rather than padding a tier.
Structural findings, not just hit lists
Shared registered agents, layered ownership, dissolved-and-refiled entities, and address reuse are the patterns that matter in financial crime. Finding them requires reading, not querying.
Compliance context included
Findings arrive interpreted against BSA/AML expectations, because the practice sits alongside an AML advisory firm.
Subject Scoping Call
A 30-minute call on one live subject: what the open record is likely to hold, what it will not, and what a defensible report would cost. If the answer is that you do not need an investigation, we will tell you.
- Realistic read on what OSINT and records can establish
- Jurisdiction and source-availability constraints, up front
- Fixed price and turnaround before you commit
/ Top S-RM alternatives in 2026
If S-RM is not the right fit, these are the options worth comparing — starting with the one we would look at first.
-
Independent practice
AM Forensics
An independent investigative due-diligence practice: open-source intelligence, public and corporate records, and metadata investigations for financial institutions, fintechs, investors, and counsel. Subjects that need judgment rather than a template — where the interesting facts are structural, and someone senior has to notice them.
-
Investigative due diligence firm
Mintz Group
Mintz Group is a specialist investigations firm focused on background investigations, due diligence, and fact-finding for law firms, corporates, and investors, with a strong reputation for rigorous, source-based work.
-
Global risk consultancy
Control Risks
Control Risks is a global specialist risk consultancy covering political risk, security, crisis management, compliance, and investigations, serving multinationals operating in complex environments.
-
Global investigations firm
Kroll
Kroll is the best-known name in corporate investigations, offering business intelligence, due diligence, forensic accounting, and cyber investigations at global scale. It is the default choice for large corporates and law firms on high-stakes matters.
-
Global investigations firm
Nardello & Co.
Nardello & Co. is a global investigations firm founded by a former federal prosecutor, known for discreet, senior-led work on complex disputes, FCPA matters, and reputational investigations.
-
Corporate ownership data platform
Sayari
Sayari builds a graph of global corporate ownership, trade, and supply-chain data, letting analysts trace beneficial ownership and counterparty networks across jurisdictions from a single interface.
-
Due-diligence research database
LexisNexis Diligence
LexisNexis provides due-diligence research tooling built on its news, legal, and public-records archives, letting compliance teams run adverse-media, sanctions, and background searches from a single platform.
-
Screening & risk-intelligence database
LSEG World-Check
World-Check, now part of LSEG Risk Intelligence, is one of the most widely used screening databases for sanctions, PEPs, and adverse media, embedded in KYC workflows across the financial-services industry.
-
Risk database & entity data
Moody's Grid
Moody's Grid is a risk database of sanctioned, politically exposed, and adversely reported entities, offered alongside Moody's broader entity, ownership, and company-data holdings for KYC and third-party screening.
/ Questions we actually get asked
Do you do transaction diligence for investors?
How many subjects can you handle at once?
Do you offer cyber incident response?
What is your turnaround?
/ Related comparisons
AM Forensics vs Mintz Group
Counsel and corporates needing rigorous background and diligence work across multiple jurisdictions.
AM Forensics vs Control Risks
Multinationals managing operating, political, and security risk across difficult jurisdictions.
AM Forensics vs Kroll
High-stakes, multi-jurisdiction matters where human source networks and firm standing are central to the outcome.