AM ForensicsAM Forensics vs Mintz Group
Mintz Group is a specialist investigations firm focused on background investigations, due diligence, and fact-finding for law firms, corporates, and investors, with a strong reputation for rigorous, source-based work.
/ How each is bought
The clearest difference is usually not features. It is what you are actually buying, who performs it, and what you own at the end.
AM Forensics
- Engagement
- Per-subject or per-matter engagement
- Pricing
- Fixed price and turnaround quoted at scoping
- Who does the work
- Named investigator, start to finish
- Independence
- Independent — no data-licensing revenue, no referral fees
Mintz Group
- Engagement
- Matter-based engagement, fixed-fee products available
- Pricing
- Fixed-fee report tiers or bespoke quote
- Who does the work
- Investigator teams across offices
- Independence
- Independent investigations firm
/ Side by side
These rows describe how each firm operates — facts you can verify — rather than judgments about product quality. Where a flat yes or no would mislead, the cell says so.
| Capability | AM Forensics | Mintz Group |
|---|---|---|
| Named investigator does the workNo handoff to an offshore research pool. | ✓Yes | ~PartlyNamed investigators lead, though assignment varies by office and matter. |
| Every finding tied to a cited sourceReports footnote the record behind each assertion. | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
| Primary public and corporate recordsFilings, courts, registries — not database aggregation alone. | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
| Metadata and digital-artifact analysisDocument provenance, EXIF, file-history examination. | ✓Yes | −No |
| Fixed price quoted before work beginsScope and cost agreed in writing, not billed open-ended. | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
| Report structured for counsel and courtWritten anticipating challenge and privilege. | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
| Single-subject engagements acceptedNo annual contract or subscription minimum. | ✓Yes | ~PartlySingle-subject products exist; account relationships are the norm. |
| AML and financial-crime contextFindings interpreted against BSA/AML expectations. | ✓Yes | ~PartlyFinancial-crime context available; not the firm's central discipline. |
| Named turnaround commitmentA date, agreed at scoping. | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
/ Where Mintz Group is the better call
We would rather you buy the right thing than buy from us. Here is where Mintz Group genuinely wins.
Mintz Group does this well
- Genuinely rigorous, source-based investigative methodology
- Strong law-firm relationships and understanding of counsel requirements
- Broad office footprint supporting local records work
Best for: Counsel and corporates needing rigorous background and diligence work across multiple jurisdictions.
Where teams still come to us
- Team-based delivery means the investigator can change between matters.
- Metadata and digital-artifact examination is not the core discipline.
- AML and financial-crime interpretation of findings is a separate expertise.
AM Forensics fits when: When the subject sits in a financial-crime context — an MSB customer, a fintech founder, a correspondent counterparty — and findings need interpreting against BSA/AML expectations, not just reported.
/ Three reasons teams choose AM Forensics instead
Findings interpreted against AML expectations
A hit on an adverse-media search is a data point. Whether it changes your risk rating, triggers EDD, or requires a filing is a compliance judgment — AM Forensics makes it, because the practice sits alongside an AML advisory firm.
Metadata and digital artifacts in scope
Document provenance, EXIF, and file-history examination are core capabilities here, not a referral to a separate practice.
One investigator, every time
The same person handles your matters, so context accumulates instead of resetting.
Subject Scoping Call
A 30-minute call on one live subject: what the open record is likely to hold, what it will not, and what a defensible report would cost. If the answer is that you do not need an investigation, we will tell you.
- Realistic read on what OSINT and records can establish
- Jurisdiction and source-availability constraints, up front
- Fixed price and turnaround before you commit
/ Top Mintz Group alternatives in 2026
If Mintz Group is not the right fit, these are the options worth comparing — starting with the one we would look at first.
-
Independent practice
AM Forensics
An independent investigative due-diligence practice: open-source intelligence, public and corporate records, and metadata investigations for financial institutions, fintechs, investors, and counsel. When the subject sits in a financial-crime context — an MSB customer, a fintech founder, a correspondent counterparty — and findings need interpreting against BSA/AML expectations, not just reported.
-
Global investigations firm
Kroll
Kroll is the best-known name in corporate investigations, offering business intelligence, due diligence, forensic accounting, and cyber investigations at global scale. It is the default choice for large corporates and law firms on high-stakes matters.
-
Global investigations firm
Nardello & Co.
Nardello & Co. is a global investigations firm founded by a former federal prosecutor, known for discreet, senior-led work on complex disputes, FCPA matters, and reputational investigations.
-
Corporate intelligence & cyber
S-RM
S-RM is a corporate intelligence and cyber-security consultancy providing due diligence, investigations, and incident response, with a strong presence in the private-equity and law-firm markets.
-
Global risk consultancy
Control Risks
Control Risks is a global specialist risk consultancy covering political risk, security, crisis management, compliance, and investigations, serving multinationals operating in complex environments.
-
Corporate ownership data platform
Sayari
Sayari builds a graph of global corporate ownership, trade, and supply-chain data, letting analysts trace beneficial ownership and counterparty networks across jurisdictions from a single interface.
-
Due-diligence research database
LexisNexis Diligence
LexisNexis provides due-diligence research tooling built on its news, legal, and public-records archives, letting compliance teams run adverse-media, sanctions, and background searches from a single platform.
-
Screening & risk-intelligence database
LSEG World-Check
World-Check, now part of LSEG Risk Intelligence, is one of the most widely used screening databases for sanctions, PEPs, and adverse media, embedded in KYC workflows across the financial-services industry.
-
Risk database & entity data
Moody's Grid
Moody's Grid is a risk database of sanctioned, politically exposed, and adversely reported entities, offered alongside Moody's broader entity, ownership, and company-data holdings for KYC and third-party screening.
/ Questions we actually get asked
Do you do pre-employment background checks?
What is metadata investigation?
Can you cover international subjects?
How does the AML connection help?
/ Related comparisons
AM Forensics vs Kroll
High-stakes, multi-jurisdiction matters where human source networks and firm standing are central to the outcome.
AM Forensics vs Nardello & Co.
Sensitive, high-stakes matters requiring discretion and senior former-government judgment.
AM Forensics vs S-RM
Private-equity and corporate transaction diligence at pace across multiple targets.